Last blog added on Monday, September 22nd, 2025

Information About Alberta Employment Law Blog – Bow River Law

Recent Posts

Below is a preview of the five most recent posts from the blog Alberta Employment Law Blog – Bow River Law. To read these posts in their entirely or subscribe to future updates from this blog, please visit their website!

  • Just Cause For a Detached Van Body

    In Driol v NOV Canada ULC, 2025 ABCJ 214 (Higa), the Court of Justice found an employer had just cause to dismiss the employment of a supervisory employee. This case is important because it involves allegations of cause and the accountability of supervisory employees. Facts The following were some o … Read more »

  • Employees Should Record Work Hours In Case Employers Don’t

    In ARH Developments Inc. o/a ARH Holdings v Elrateb, 2025 ABESAB 18, the Alberta Employment Standards Appeal Body concluded that a worker was an employee, not an independent contractor, and was therefore entitled to unpaid wages, overtime pay, and vacation pay. This decision reinforces the importanc … Read more »

  • Ignoring AHRT A Factor In Becoming Personal Individual Respondent

    In Wallace v Pawsitively Purrfect Pet Spa Ltd., 2025 AHRC 119, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal added the director of the corporate respondent, in her personal capacity, as a respondent to a complaint (the “Complaint”). This case is interesting not only because it provides a summary of the test whi … Read more »

  • Waste Management Company Fails to Get Fiduciary Non-Solicitation Injunction

    In Garbage King Inc. v Voth, 2025 ABKB 661 (Justice Jones) the Alberta Court of King’s Bench rejected an injunction application by a waste management company to prevent a former employee and his new employer from soliciting clients and using knowledge of client needs and how they conduct business. T … Read more »

  • One Too Many Professional Misconduct Complaints

    In Chartered Professional Accountants of Alberta v Saleh, 2025 ABKB 642 (Oviatt), the Alberta Court of King’s Bench restricted the ability of a complainant to make future complaints related to CPAA without leave of the Court. This case is important because administrative tribunals like the CPAA have … Read more »